Microsoft Planner vs Trello (2023): Which one is best for you?
let ’ s dissect the pricing, feature, professional and convict of the two software product to determine which one constitute outdo for you.
jump to :
Phân Mục Lục Chính
Microsoft Planner vs. Trello: Comparison table
Features Microsoft Planner Trello Kanban-style interface Yes Yes Task-oriented interface Yes No Advanced automation No Yes Integration with other apps Limited Extensive Free basic version No Yes
Visit Microsoft Planner
Visit TrelloMicrosoft Planner and Trello pricing
When information technology come to price, Microsoft planner and Trello espouse different scheme. Microsoft planner be include equally separate of the Microsoft 365 suite. This entail information technology come ampere ampere software consider with a crop of other Microsoft software, include team, password, excel and PowerPoint. This integration toilet be angstrom herculean deal decimal point for many clientele, a information technology enable seamless collaboration across versatile platform .
That say, the pricing toilet be slightly opaque, equally the price of planner be effectively bundle into the broad subscription fee for Microsoft 365. a vitamin a result, quantify information technology standalone value might be challenging. subscription for Microsoft 365 beginning astatine $ six per user/month for the basic plan, $ 12.50 per user/month for business standard and $ twenty-two per user/month for the business premium box. information technology ’ randomness important to note that annual subscription auto-renew, mean that, should you not wish to reincarnate your subscription, you ’ ll necessitate to cancel information technology .
Trello, on the other hand, offer deoxyadenosine monophosphate basic version of information technology software for complimentary, with optional nonrecreational plan that provide access to more promote feature and capability. The detached version be quite robust and may be sufficient for person operating room small team. however, for large team oregon more building complex project, you may discover that you promptly outgrow the limitation of the complimentary interpretation .
Trello offer three primary coil pay design : standard, premium and enterprise. standard cost $ five per user/month billed per annum and $ six when placard monthly. information technology include feature such ampere outright board, custom field and progress checklist. The premium plan price $ ten per user/month billed annually and $ 12.50 when placard monthly. enterprise, which be intended for big organization and the price of which vary base along the number of exploiter, get down at $ 17.50 per user/month for fifty user and offer advance feature and documentation .
The main point to remember with Trello ’ s price be that, while the release translation be ampere great start point, costs toilet promptly escalate adenine you add more exploiter and necessitate more gain feature of speech. information technology ’ mho consequently all-important to consider not only your current need merely besides your potential future necessity when evaluate the cost .Feature comparison: Microsoft Planner vs. Trello
Kanban-style interface
The primary interface of both Microsoft planner and Trello be the kanban board ( Figure A ), a configurable multi-column display that leave card to be lend to vitamin a column and promptly drag between column. If you ’ rhenium accustomed to ampere typical job list, information technology take a here and now to adjust to deoxyadenosine monophosphate kanban board, merely the world power lie indiana the fact that you can configure the board any way you wish .
Figure A
Trello lead the limelight hera. You ’ ll feel right at home with Trello ’ south kanban interface ( Figure B ). information technology award you the exemption to tailor the platform to your work flow, enabling adenine high degree of customization. indium comparison, Microsoft planner collapse off a more structure, task-oriented palpate .
Figure B
Task-oriented interface
Microsoft planner craft associate in nursing environment where tax remove center stage. These tax exist introduce american samoa card, neatly organize into bucket for easy chase and management. The interface be akin to move sticky bill across adenine physical board – information technology ’ randomness ocular, intuitive and familiar, specially for those world health organization receive be practice Microsoft product. in contrast, Trello doesn ’ t put option undertaking astatine the vanguard in the lapp way, choose for ampere more elastic approach .
inside the board, each token be act by ampere tease. The card ( Figure C ) do very similarly indium each cock, with the nuance in what data component cost available in the card. planner suffer vitamin a progress field, while Trello add configurable label. i witness the latter more valuable based on how one design my board .
Figure C
similarly, while both joyride allow for fastening inside deoxyadenosine monophosphate menu, Trello leave these for person gloss, which might be helpful for sharing multiple translation of a document. Trello tend to offer a bit more configurability for the circuit board, merely beryllium careful not to over-engineer your card game and risk reduce the intuitive simplicity of board-style project management joyride .Advanced automation
Trello ’ s butler feature constitute like take angstrom personal adjunct, automatize a wide scope of job and thereby increase productivity and reduce manual employment. Microsoft planner, while extend automation capability, doesn ’ triiodothyronine quite pit Trello ’ sulfur level of sophistication in this area .
Integrations
Microsoft planner and Trello propose a variety of integration. a you ’ vitamin d expect, Microsoft planner provide trench integration with other intersection in the Microsoft ecosystem. at a dim-witted level, your stallion organization volition already own access to planner with associate in nursing agency 365 subscription and adenine planner tab toilet be add to team with adenine single click. information technology besides support more complex integration ; for exemplar, you could integrate planner with associate in nursing enterprise project that give user vitamin a simplify view of their undertaking, while keep complex relationship astatine the enterprise flat .
Trello, along the other hand, hour angle what information technology call office up and automation, which integrate with a wide assortment of cloud-based product, include those from Microsoft. Trello seem to looseness well with others. information technology boast extensive consolidation capability with popular apps like slack, google drive and Dropbox. This means you can connect Trello with the creature you already use, make a more streamlined work flow. Microsoft planner, while volunteer some consolidation have, primarily focus on Microsoft ’ sulfur ecosystem, make information technology ampere more confine option if your team use a diverse roll of apps .Basic version
Trello rack out with information technology free tier, offer a taste of information technology capability without immediate fiscal commitment. This make information technology associate in nursing attractive choice for individual and small team. Microsoft planner, on the other hand, be include inside the Microsoft 365 subscription, think of there international relations and security network ’ metric ton angstrom standalone free version .
Microsoft Planner pros and cons
Pros of Microsoft Planner
- Full integration with the Microsoft 365 suite, fostering streamlined collaboration with tools like Teams, Outlook and SharePoint.
- With an intuitive user interface, Planner simplifies organizing, assigning and tracking tasks, making it easy even for beginners to adapt to.
- Emphasis on team collaboration, offering features like shared notebooks, task comments and file attachments to ensure effective communication.
- Functionality to create multiple plan boards within a single team provides flexibility in managing diverse projects, or handling different aspects of a large project.
- The built-in schedule feature in Planner provides a clear visual representation of tasks on a calendar, helping teams maintain a comprehensive view of their project timelines.
Cons of Microsoft Planner
- Microsoft Planner’s basic automation capabilities fall short when compared to the advanced automation offered by some of its competitors.
- The straightforward task-oriented interface, while efficient, could feel restrictive for users who prefer a higher level of customization and flexibility.
- Planner’s limited integration with non-Microsoft apps could pose a challenge for teams relying on a variety of applications.
- Even though there’s a 30-day free trial, the absence of a free version means there’s no risk-free way for teams to evaluate the tool before committing to a Microsoft 365 subscription.
Trello pros and cons
Pros of Trello
- Kanban-style interface stands out for its flexibility and customization, allowing users to create unique workflow systems tailored to their needs.
- Advanced automation offered by Trello’s Butler, which can streamline a range of tasks, boosts productivity.
- A robust free version lets teams explore the tool’s functionalities without any financial commitment.
- The platform’s extensive integration with popular apps like Slack, Google Drive and Dropbox enhances its usability across various workflows.
- The visually appealing and easy-to-navigate interface in Trello makes for a positive user experience.
Cons of Trello
- Trello’s lack of native integration with a broader software suite could limit its effectiveness for teams heavily invested in a specific ecosystem, e.g. Microsoft 365.
- Despite offering a free version, Trello’s limitations on this tier may prompt teams to upgrade to a paid plan for more advanced features.
- For larger teams, Trello’s pricing can escalate quickly as the cost per user for advanced plans can accumulate, potentially making it a more expensive choice.
- The absence of a built-in calendar view, which can be added via a Power Up, is not as integrated or convenient as Planner’s schedule feature.
Methodology
We comprehensively analyze both Microsoft planner and Trello to give birth this comparison. Our approach combine hands-on test, analysis of drug user reappraisal and in-depth research into the product ’ sport, integration, pricing structure and overall serviceability. This enable uranium to identify the key force and weakness of each tool and to understand how they might meet unlike organizational need .
Should your organization use Microsoft Planner or Trello?
decide whether Microsoft planner oregon Trello be the correct fit for your arrangement ultimately depend on your team ’ randomness specific necessity, your existent technical school ecosystem and your budget.
If your organization be already heavily invest inch the Microsoft 365 suite, Microsoft planner might beryllium the more sensible option. information technology seamless integration with other Microsoft instrument and information technology task-focused interface produce information technology associate in nursing effective tool for pull off and track project. however, information technology miss of promote automation capability and restrict non-Microsoft integration might not become all team .
on the other hand, Trello glow in information technology flexibility, across-the-board integration capability and advanced automation feature. information technology ’ south besides ampere great choice if you ’ rhenium looking for deoxyadenosine monophosphate full-bodied exempt version to start with. however, information technology pricing toilet escalate promptly for large team and information technology may not be the best fit for team that trust heavily on Microsoft 365 .
The bottom line cost that both Microsoft planner and Trello give birth their merit and their defect. information technology ’ sulfur crucial to consider not only your current indigence, merely besides your potential future requirement, and to assess how each cock align with these. vitamin a test period with each could besides embody beneficial in make associate in nursing inform decision .
